On 08/11/2015 05:24 PM, Moshe Levi wrote: > >> Laine's patch is now pushed - I assume at least parts of this will be necessary >> since there are reports of different GFEATURE_SIZE values... > Ok, Do you want me to rebase my patch on top on this > http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=bfaaa2b681018f3705bae17c001700a03f67d7c4 > and fixing all Laine comments or to wait for the cleanup patch you mention below? I would say just rebase your patch on top of the simpler patch that I pushed, and resend it; leave cleaning up the other nits that I found until later (if even then). Parts of my "cleanup" had the effect of causing a failure return any time the ioctl returned an error, which I now see may not be the best course of action, so some of my proposed changes are suspect at best :-) -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list