On 08/10/2015 05:23 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 17:06:31 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251886 >> >> We do not allow delete an iothread which id is 0 in >> virDomainDelIOThread, but allow it in virDomainAddIOThread, >> Also we will output an error when parse an iothread which id >> is 0. >> >> Add a check for iothread_id in virDomainAddIOThread to fix >> it. > > The limitation that iothread id shall not be 0 comes from the qemu > implementation so I think that we could possibly want to have iothread > id 0 in the future. > Sort of.. The initial implementation used 0 (zero) as a marker of sorts for no iothreads, so 'iothread0' made no sense. At that time there was no add/del a specific thread. However, now that there are iothreadid's to manage the iothreads<N> value, it perhaps makes less sense to restrict usage of 0 (zero) except of course for historical purposes. There probably would need to be checks in multiple places adjusted though in order to manage the iothreadid's which 'assume' we start at 1 and count upwards when there is no <iothread id="#"/> provided in the domain XML. John > I think the check should be done in the qemu driver. > > Peter > > > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list