On 07/24/2015 06:10 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:01:22PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: >> >> >> On 06/30/2015 04:19 PM, Chris J Arges wrote: >>> In commit fbcf7da95, a change was introduced that no longer allowed defining > > As John pointed out, it was commit 155ca616e that changed it. > >>> volumes via XML with a capacity of '0'. Because we check for info.size_arg to be >>> non-zero, this use-case fails. This patch allows info.size_arg to be zero if no >>> backing store is specified. >>> > > I must admit I do not see the use case here. > Should we allow zero-sized volumes with backing stores too? > Other than that the fix looks good to me. > >>> Signed-off-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> >> Found an orphaned patch.... >> > > Nice catch, it must've slipped through the cracks. > >> Since that's Jan's fix - he should have a say here, but it seems you're >> correct. Also of note is commit id '155ca616e' which changed the check >> to add that check for size_arg being non-zero. >> >> The ordering of the date of when the change was created is odd. Commit >> id 'fbcf7da95' was committed after '155ca616e', but authored months before. > > It was resting in my local git for a while, then rebased against master. > The AuthorDate only says when the commit was started and does not get > updated with every amend/rebase. > > Jan > Hey thanks for taking a look. At this point do you need me to re-send the patch with any updates? --chris -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list