Re: [PATCH glib 1/2] README: formally document intended platform support targets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:57:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:57:59AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > +As an example, as of July 1st 2015, this policy would aim to pick the
> > > +min versions based on what's available across the following sample
> > > +distros:
> > > +
> > > + - RHEL: 7.0, 7.1
> > > + - Fedora: 21, 22
> > > + - Ubuntu LTS: 14.04 (Trusty)
> > > + - Ubuntu: 14.10 (Utopic), 15.04 (Vivid)
> > > + - Suse: 12.0
> > > + - OpenSUSE: 13.1, 13.2
> > > + - Debian: 8.0 (Jessie)
> 
> I think I'll move this list of example versions ot the commit message
> to avoid confusing people in a few years time, as Zeeshan pointed out.

Either is fine with me. We can also update that list every few years
when it starts getting odd (but this most likely will never get done as
we'll never look into README :)

Christophe

Attachment: pgpMm2LD1QlR5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]