On 05/14/2015 07:57 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 17:08:53 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote:As we have a new device address type 'dimm', add some document and an example to our docs. Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> --- docs/formatdomain.html.in | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in index e0b6ba7..0e908a1 100644 --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in @@ -2876,6 +2876,13 @@ attributes: <code>iobase</code> and <code>irq</code>. <span class="since">Since 1.2.1</span> </dd> + <dt><code>type='dimm'</code></dt> + <dd>DIMM addresses, for memory device, have the following additional + attributes: <code>slot</code> (a value between 0 and 4294967295, + inclusive), and <code>base</code> (a hex value between 0 and + 0xffffffffffffffff, inclusive). + <span class="since">Since 1.2.14</span>The values for the DIMM address shouldn't really be documented. I'd rather state that the values are determined automatically and the user should not need to touch them.
Oh, i see, i will remove the value for DIMM address and add some mention about the values.
Thanks for your quick review.
Peter
Luyao -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list