On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 17:08:53 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote: > As we have a new device address type 'dimm', add > some document and an example to our docs. > > Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/formatdomain.html.in | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in > index e0b6ba7..0e908a1 100644 > --- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in > +++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in > @@ -2876,6 +2876,13 @@ > attributes: <code>iobase</code> and <code>irq</code>. > <span class="since">Since 1.2.1</span> > </dd> > + <dt><code>type='dimm'</code></dt> > + <dd>DIMM addresses, for memory device, have the following additional > + attributes: <code>slot</code> (a value between 0 and 4294967295, > + inclusive), and <code>base</code> (a hex value between 0 and > + 0xffffffffffffffff, inclusive). > + <span class="since">Since 1.2.14</span> The values for the DIMM address shouldn't really be documented. I'd rather state that the values are determined automatically and the user should not need to touch them. Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list