Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] nodedev: move pci express types to virpci.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:06:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Finding virPCIE* code is more intuitive if located in virpci.h
instead of node_device_conf.h.

* src/conf/node_device_conf.h (virPCIELinkSpeed, virPCIELink)
(virPCIEDeviceInfo): Move...
* src/util/virpci.h: ...here.
* src/conf/node_device_conf.c (virPCIELinkSpeed): Likewise.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/conf/node_device_conf.c |  3 ---
src/conf/node_device_conf.h | 29 +----------------------------
src/util/virpci.c           |  3 +++
src/util/virpci.h           | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/virpci.h b/src/util/virpci.h
index d64c3e2..edec439 100644
--- a/src/util/virpci.h
+++ b/src/util/virpci.h
[...]
+typedef struct _virPCIEDeviceInfo virPCIEDeviceInfo;
+typedef virPCIEDeviceInfo *virPCIEDeviceInfoPtr;
+struct _virPCIEDeviceInfo {
+    /* Not all PCI Express devices has link. For example this 'Root Complex

I know it's pre-existing, but reading "devices has link" makes the
back of my head itch, shouldn't it be 'have'?  Could you change it if
I am right?

Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]