Stefan de Konink wrote: >>> Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot >>> be a real entry? This assumption is wrong. >> Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there is >> code below that that is. However, the code here is generally looking for block >> devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device. Given that, I'm not >> sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples? > > The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device. OK, cool, I misunderstood. Given that, can you give me the output of: # ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0 Just to make sure I get the right thing? Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list