Chris Lalancette schreef:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
+ n = scandir(sysfs_path, &namelist, notdotdir, versionsort);
+ if (n <= 0) {
+ /* we didn't find any reasonable entries; return failure */
+ virStorageReportError(conn, VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
+ _("Failed to find any LUNs for session %s: %s"),
+ session, strerror(errno));
+
+ return -1;
+ }
Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot
be a real entry? This assumption is wrong.
Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there is
code below that that is. However, the code here is generally looking for block
devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device. Given that, I'm not
sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?
The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device.
xen01 3:0:0:0 # ls -l
total 0
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:25 FUA
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:25 allow_restart
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:25 cache_type
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jun 12 16:23 device ->
../../../devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:25 manage_start_stop
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jun 12 16:25 subsystem ->
../../../class/scsi_disk
--w------- 1 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:25 uevent
cat /sys/class/iscsi_session/session3/targetname
iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:c6719b9f-7993-444d-c6d2-80d4e15ee52c
And the same counts for a netapp target.
Stefan
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list