On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:34:26PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2007-September/msg00119.html > > Since that thread is split across two months, can I bring to everyone's > attention the post I made yesterday: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2007-October/msg00057.html > > In particular the concept at the end that we shouldn't even try to > support every possible remote storage, but instead allow the > administrator to write "scriptlets" (small shell scripts with a > well-defined input & output) to perform a set of operations: This is really just an implementation detail. We still need to define the storage concepts we want to expose in the public API, before figuring out on the backend implementation. Most of the implementation wiill pretty much have to follow the scheme of just invoking command line tools like lvcreate and lvs, since formal APIs are scarse. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list