On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:16:15PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > > This matters only if/when this realloc call fails. And then, only in > > the small way that with this patch, there's a slightly better chance of > > recovering from the low-memory condition. > > Looks good, but please don't apply this to CVS. I'll make the equivalent > fix in my QEMU patch series. > > /me doesn't want to re-diff a series of 20 patches again :-) dohh, patch out then :-\ Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/