On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:55:22AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > This matters only if/when this realloc call fails. And then, only in > the small way that with this patch, there's a slightly better chance of > recovering from the low-memory condition. Looks good, but please don't apply this to CVS. I'll make the equivalent fix in my QEMU patch series. /me doesn't want to re-diff a series of 20 patches again :-) Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|