Re: [PATCH] hypervisor version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
> This is another patch which may not be popular? Xen's
> extra version does not fit in libvirt's release field (since it's
> part of an int).
> 
> Instead of printing out the wrong value, just display
> major.minor in virsh.

Hmm, so with Xen we have two backend impls of the Version API, one talking
to the hypervisor which only ever returns the first 2 components, and the
other talking to XenD which processes all 3.

As you say, in practice the extra version from Xen is effectively garbage

So while as root I see

# virsh version
Compiled against library: libvir 0.2.2
Using library: libvir 0.2.2
Using API: Xen 3.0.1
Running hypervisor: Xen 3.1.0

If run as non-root I instead seee

$ virsh version
Compiled against library: libvir 0.2.2
Using library: libvir 0.2.2
Using API: Xen 3.0.1
Running hypervisor: Xen 3.730.259


I think instead of this patch to change the virsh driver though, we should
change teh xend_internal.c file to ignore the extra_version data from XenD
as there's no way to meaningfully interpret it as an int.

Dan,
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]