On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 14:32 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:27:02PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 03:03 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > For the reverse Xen will tell us what bridge device a > > > guest is using, and we can reverse lookup the corresponding network > > > > I'm not sure why you want this? > > Without this you be sending in > > <interface type='network'> > <source network='foo'> > </interface> > > And be getting back > > <interface type='bridge'> > <source bridge='virbr0'> > </interface> > > As far as is possible the XML used to create a VM should be identical > to that you get back from libvirt once it is running. Absolutely, very good point. There's a few places where we return the current running state rather than the initial configuration we provided, but this would be a particularly bad case. It's a bit fugly, though - should libvirt do ListDomains(), GetBridgName() and match the bridge name, or should we have virNetworkLookupByBridge() and make qemud do the lookup itself? Cheers, Mark.