On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 04:44 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > In general I really prefer restartable daemons especially if the client can > auto restart them if they are gone missing, it makes users and sysadmins > life so much easier (and avoid the need to start the daemon at bootup, which > is yet another pain), though I understand this may be hard to achieve because > we have too much state. Well, the problem here is that you want the daemon to start guests and domains at boot time. That's the main reason for the initscript. > With respect to the unification of the various daemons, this also sounds > like a really nice thing to have, but I must admit I'm a bit lost, I don't > have really a clear picture of all the requirements (and probably won't until > we finalize at least a first version of the networking support). Stop confusing me! :-) s/networking/remote/ Cheers, Mark.