On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:25 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > So far, the release model for libvirt (correct me if I'm wrong) has been > that you periodically bundle up the latest version of libvirt and put it > on the website. There's no experimental branch where we can place > things like a libvirt remote patch with the proviso that at some point > later we can say "sorry, that didn't work". I'd be happy to see this stuff in CVS on a "remote branch", but it would be quite a pain for you to maintain a branch in CVS. Cheers, Mark.