On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:29:38PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > Add a Red Hat style init script, using the service name > > > libvirt_qemud. > > > > I'm wondering about the future where we have Rich's libvirtd to start > > up too. Perhaps we should call the init script just 'libvirtd' and > > in the future it can either start both libvirt_qemud & libvirtd or > > if we merge the two, just start libvirtd. That way we won't have to > > worry about possible renaming of the init script during an update. > > Sounds good to me, how about just re-naming the daemon to libvirtd > too ? That'll cause a bit of an annoying namespace clash with Rich's existing code for libvirtd. I think it'll be fine to keep it as libvirt_qemud for now, because the user will never be directly exposed to this name, it'll either autospawn (unprivileged users), or be started indirectly with the init script. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|