On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Add a Red Hat style init script, using the service name > > libvirt_qemud. > > I'm wondering about the future where we have Rich's libvirtd to start > up too. Perhaps we should call the init script just 'libvirtd' and > in the future it can either start both libvirt_qemud & libvirtd or > if we merge the two, just start libvirtd. That way we won't have to > worry about possible renaming of the init script during an update. Sounds good to me, how about just re-naming the daemon to libvirtd too ? Cheers, Mark.