Re: Re: support for hvm guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:53:02AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >Don't think I want to waste anymore time with this bug since the http 
> >/ sexp interface is going away - which brings me to a question.  Why 
> >is libvirt still using this interface and not xmlrpc?  Perhaps my time 
> >would be better spent moving libvirt to this interface.  I would like 
> >to submit the hvm patch for libvirt but can't reliably test it at this 
> >point.
> 
> wrt XML-RPC, I think I'm to blame for that.  I've not gotten around to 
> modifying the internals of libvirt to switch between 
> XML-RPC/S-Expression.  I'd suggest just reverting the xend_post to the 
> older code so you can keep making progress.

 Note, I've commited some XMP-RPC tests and minor xml/xmlrpc code
 changes to libvirt. It seems that Anthony's xmlrpc code works fine
 against Python SimpleXMLRPCServer. For more details see CVS.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]