On 6/14/19 2:54 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > CentOS, differently than RHEL, does not support pointing releases at > all. If we knew that when adding the entry in the first place, we'd > never have a centos7.0 entry. > > The easiest way to work around the mistake made in the past is by adding > centos7 as short-id so OSes with a "new enough" libosinfo could just > start using it without any issues. > > Together with this change, let's also change the name from CentOS 7.0 to > CentOS 7 as it's the distro preferred way to advertise the system. > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > index 3617d36..c1b4e9f 100644 > --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in > @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ > See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text --> > <os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0";> > <short-id>centos7.0</short-id> > - <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name> > - <version>7.0</version> > + <short-id>centos7</short-id> > + <_name>CentOS 7</_name> > + <version>7</version> > <_vendor>CentOS</_vendor> > <family>linux</family> > <distro>centos</distro> > Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> - Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
