CentOS, differently than RHEL, does not support pointing releases at
all. If we knew that when adding the entry in the first place, we'd
never have a centos7.0 entry.
The easiest way to work around the mistake made in the past is by adding
centos7 as short-id so OSes with a "new enough" libosinfo could just
start using it without any issues.
Together with this change, let's also change the name from CentOS 7.0 to
CentOS 7 as it's the distro preferred way to advertise the system.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
index 3617d36..c1b4e9f 100644
--- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
+++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ for a copy of the license text -->
<os id="http://centos.org/centos/7.0";>
<short-id>centos7.0</short-id>
- <_name>CentOS 7.0</_name>
- <version>7.0</version>
+ <short-id>centos7</short-id>
+ <_name>CentOS 7</_name>
+ <version>7</version>
<_vendor>CentOS</_vendor>
<family>linux</family>
<distro>centos</distro>
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
