Altough there's no issue on using "=" with the test, let's standardize
on a single way to compare values, using "==".
With that in mind, let's change "xHAVE_REQUESTS" = "xyes" to
"xHAVE_REQUESTS" == "xyes" instead.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index f3139f2..d6fa38f 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ else
HAVE_PYTEST="no"
HAVE_REQUESTS="no"
fi
-AM_CONDITIONAL([EXECUTE_TESTS], [test "x$HAVE_PYTEST" == "xyes" && "x$HAVE_REQUESTS" = "xyes"])
+AM_CONDITIONAL([EXECUTE_TESTS], [test "x$HAVE_PYTEST" == "xyes" && "x$HAVE_REQUESTS" == "xyes"])
LT_INIT([shared disable-static win32-dll])
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
