Re: [PATCH] Drop redundant 'const' keyword from object parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:09:02PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:21:21AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > 
> > > > > It's definitely not used consistently, but removing a 'const' from
> > > > > external API is going to cause breakage in C++ code:
> > > > 
> > > > Well that's true but IMHO this breakage is OK, given:
> > > > 
> > > > * the unlikelyhood of an existing C++ project using libosinfo.
> > > 
> > > This patch would fix generation of rust bindings, which have 0 users
> > > for sure at the moment since it's broken. So there are at least as many
> > > C++ projects using libosinfo, maybe more :)
> > > If the breakage is fixed in the Rust binding generator soon, I'd rather
> > > we drop this patch.
> > 
> > I'm on the fence, but I think on balance i'm slightly in favour of  taking
> > in the patch. It doesn't change ABI, only API so it would only be source
> > level incompatible. Even then its only incompatible if the dev actually
> > declared the variable const, which is about as likely as someone using
> > C++ in the first place.
> 
> Yes, your point about the actual object most likely being declared
> without the "const" modifier also makes me lean towards taking it.

As usual, forgot to finish the email, but

Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux