On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > The schema has names for architectures which are closer to the RPM > > naming than the dpkg one -- thus, fix: > > - arm64 -> aarch64 > > - armhf -> armv7l > > Are the ones in libosinfo/tests/test-isodetect.c the right ones? Asking > since I intend to add all our architectures and flavours in the future > (once I get around to automate this). Valid architecture names are defined in data/schema/osinfo.rng are were chosen to match libvirt arch names. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
