On 12/03/2014 12:18 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey, On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:24:50AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then it's slated to be its own product. Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> --- data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ data/schemas/libosinfo.rng | 1 + ...ELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in index 791d470..b1e70e0 100644 --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in @@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ </installer> </os> + + <!-- RHEL atomic --> + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel-atomic/7.0";> <short-id>rhel-atomic-7.0</short-id> <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host 7.0</_name> @@ -1212,4 +1215,52 @@ </recommended> </resources> </os> + + + <!-- RHEL Server for Aarch64 (RHELSA) --> + + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhelsa/2.0";> + <short-id>rhelsa2.0</short-id> + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for AArch64 2.0</_name> + <version>2.0</version>Just a quick comment, version is 2.0 here but the volume id in the test case is: Volume id: RHELSA-1.5 Server.aarch64 so version is inconsistent, maybe the volume-id regexp needs to be more specific?
I think 1.5 is just the internal dev version number. Once ISOs surface publicly I'll take another look at this
- Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
