Hey, On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:24:50AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: > Long term this will likely just merge with RHEL proper, but until then > it's slated to be its own product. > > Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > data/schemas/libosinfo.rng | 1 + > ...ELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 test/isodata/rhel/rhelsa2.0/RHELSA-1.5-20141017.1-Server-aarch64-dvd1.iso.txt > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > index 791d470..b1e70e0 100644 > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > @@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ > </installer> > </os> > > + > + <!-- RHEL atomic --> > + > <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel-atomic/7.0";> > <short-id>rhel-atomic-7.0</short-id> > <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host 7.0</_name> > @@ -1212,4 +1215,52 @@ > </recommended> > </resources> > </os> > + > + > + <!-- RHEL Server for Aarch64 (RHELSA) --> > + > + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhelsa/2.0";> > + <short-id>rhelsa2.0</short-id> > + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server for AArch64 2.0</_name> > + <version>2.0</version> Just a quick comment, version is 2.0 here but the volume id in the test case is: Volume id: RHELSA-1.5 Server.aarch64 so version is inconsistent, maybe the volume-id regexp needs to be more specific? Christophe
Attachment:
pgpQa0aGUT2Q9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
