On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any > bug that's ever been filed has had a response: > > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8 > > There's at least 3 patches in there as well. > > I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default > assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker > to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*, > libguestfs, and virt-manager use. > > If so the process would be: > > - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need > default assignee and cc list at least. > - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac > - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of > them are obsolete. > - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/ (in fact, they can probably disable > this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org) > > Thoughts? The only reason why we have a trac instance at all is becasuse you get that by default when setting up on Fedora hosted. The trak bugtracker is really horrible so I'd be in favour of moving to bugzilla, despite its own flaws. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
