On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > > > --- > > > data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 50 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > > index 589f3be..fc844f0 100644 > > > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > > @@ -914,4 +914,54 @@ > > > <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/> > > > </installer> > > > </os> > > > + > > > + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.0";> > > > + <short-id>rhel7.0</short-id> > > > + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0</_name> > > > + <version>7.0</version> > > > + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor> > > > + <family>linux</family> > > > + <distro>rhel</distro> > > > + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.4"/> > > > > > > > Should be 6.5, no? > > > > ACK!. > > Should probably not upgrade anything at all, just like rhel 6.0 did not > upgrade rhel 5.x Well there *is* an upgrade relationship between them - in place upgrades are supported by anaconda. So not having that in libosinfo would be a bug imho Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
