On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > --- > > data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 50 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > index 589f3be..fc844f0 100644 > > --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in > > @@ -914,4 +914,54 @@ > > <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/> > > </installer> > > </os> > > + > > + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.0";> > > + <short-id>rhel7.0</short-id> > > + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0</_name> > > + <version>7.0</version> > > + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor> > > + <family>linux</family> > > + <distro>rhel</distro> > > + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.4"/> > > > > Should be 6.5, no? > > ACK!. Should probably not upgrade anything at all, just like rhel 6.0 did not upgrade rhel 5.x Christophe
Attachment:
pgpN8tEZkCk7u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
