On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Fabiano Fidencio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:22 +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Fabiano Fidencio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Zeeshan, >> > >> > On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:00 +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> gnome-continuous is continuous integration system so images produced by >> >> it track the git master of all modules and now that GNOME 3.10 is out and >> >> many projects have branched for 3.10 maintainance, these images are >> >> already 3.12 (3.11 at the moment but thats splitting hair I guess). >> > >> > I'd like (to try) to explain why gnome-continuous-3.12 is something that >> > doesn't make sense to me. >> > >> > The idea I have of using gnome-continuous is that I'll always be using >> > git master. Is that right? >> > Considering that I'm always using git master, why should it refer 3.12, >> > 3.14, whatever? >> > Would I be able, in the future (2 years from now), to create and use a >> > gnome-continuous-3.12 virtual machine? I don't think so and it's the >> > reason I don't believe we should have it "versioned". >> >> Sure but there is nothing stopping you from doing that. If you got a >> 3.12 image at the time of 3.18, Boxes (or any app) should be about to >> tell that it is a 3.12 image and not a 3.18 one. > > Okay, it will have an image like GNOME-3.12, for instance? No, A gnome-continuous image from the time of 3.12 (or rather 3.11) development. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
