On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:22 +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Fabiano Fidencio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Zeeshan, > > > > On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 16:00 +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> gnome-continuous is continuous integration system so images produced by > >> it track the git master of all modules and now that GNOME 3.10 is out and > >> many projects have branched for 3.10 maintainance, these images are > >> already 3.12 (3.11 at the moment but thats splitting hair I guess). > > > > I'd like (to try) to explain why gnome-continuous-3.12 is something that > > doesn't make sense to me. > > > > The idea I have of using gnome-continuous is that I'll always be using > > git master. Is that right? > > Considering that I'm always using git master, why should it refer 3.12, > > 3.14, whatever? > > Would I be able, in the future (2 years from now), to create and use a > > gnome-continuous-3.12 virtual machine? I don't think so and it's the > > reason I don't believe we should have it "versioned". > > Sure but there is nothing stopping you from doing that. If you got a > 3.12 image at the time of 3.18, Boxes (or any app) should be about to > tell that it is a 3.12 image and not a 3.18 one. Okay, it will have an image like GNOME-3.12, for instance? Because, from my point of view, it is something clearly distinct from the GNOME-Continuous and should not be represented as the same by libosinfo. _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
