On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:43:58PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You are missing my point, I'm saying that ostree based images are very > > different from the GNOME live CDs that are already listed in libosinfo > > database, > > And that is simply not true. They are both GNOME. The fact that <=3.8 > media were based on fedora was an implementation detail that is pretty > irrelevant. They are both still the same OS. From a user point of view, this could be the way the GNOME project wants to market these images. From a libosinfo internal representation point of view, I think this 'implementation detail' is significant enough for us to represent them differently. Different base OS can also mean differences in hardware supported by the image. The live cd and these ostree images are very different things, let's represent them _internally_ as different OSes (note that I haven't said anything about the user-visible OS names). Christophe
Attachment:
pgpmMxhQi7Boi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
