On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:42:16PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > > I am not adding ISO info because due to gnome-ostree project now > producing installed qcow2 images, the motivation to produce the ISOs has > dropped significantly. > > Would be really nice for libosinfo to be able to detect OS from images > too but that might not be feasible so at least for now apps would have > to do their own detection (perhaps through guestfs). If we are not going to have a 3.10 ISO (which your initial paragraph seems to imply), then I feel it would be better to have a good story as to how we are going to support .qcow2 images before adding this. In this specific case, I don't think it's a good idea to add info meant for GNOME live cd images, and tell applications that this info is also good for GNOME os tree qcow2 images, the requirements for the 2 OSes could end up being different. Christophe
Attachment:
pgppfBhTEf3Fb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
