Re: [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:28:20PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> I think we should specify some sane recommended values. There is a
> reason why minimum and recommended are kept separate. The doc might be
> vague but one thing is clear from it: Better have more resources than
> these minimum ones if possible.

I could have said that with no doc ;) If we want to make guesses as your
2x, maybe it's better done in applications, or in libvirt-designer, when
only minimal resources are defined, make some guesses for recommended ones?

Christophe

Attachment: pgpjGgjLSCILq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux