Re: [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:50AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> While the minimum requirements are specified by F19 docs:
> 
> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview
> 
> I came-up with recommended on my own by simply multiplying the minimum
> requirements by 2.

Was there a significant difference when using these recommended values
rather than the minimum ones? I'm trying to figure out where this patch is
coming from/why it's needed.

Christophe

Attachment: pgpskTJIU4NcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux