Re: [PATCH 2/3] fedora: More correct/appr. system reqs for F19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:50AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> While the minimum requirements are specified by F19 docs:
>>
>> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview
>>
>> I came-up with recommended on my own by simply multiplying the minimum
>> requirements by 2.
>
> Was there a significant difference when using these recommended values
> rather than the minimum ones? I'm trying to figure out where this patch is
> coming from/why it's needed.

The docs (linked above) say: "The figures below are a recommended
minimum for the default installation. Your requirements may differ,
and most applications will benefit from more than the minimum
resources." and as I said in the log, I just came-up with them on my
own. Feel free to suggest different/better values.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux