On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:50AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> While the minimum requirements are specified by F19 docs: >> >> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/en-US/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#hardware_overview >> >> I came-up with recommended on my own by simply multiplying the minimum >> requirements by 2. > > Was there a significant difference when using these recommended values > rather than the minimum ones? I'm trying to figure out where this patch is > coming from/why it's needed. The docs (linked above) say: "The figures below are a recommended minimum for the default installation. Your requirements may differ, and most applications will benefit from more than the minimum resources." and as I said in the log, I just came-up with them on my own. Feel free to suggest different/better values. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
