On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 06:59:10PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > ACK. Although these patches adds a lot of lines, I think they should > still qualify as trivial especially when its from a person with commit > access. Just my two cents. Given that the OS database is probably the part of libosinfo that has seen the most bugs[1], I don't consider them as trivial and I think they should go through review first. Christophe [1] Wrong values for resources, missed occurrences during search&replace (sometimes leading to infinite loop if this is done on an <upgrades> node), missing test cases, ...
Attachment:
pgpwOSXWWvwk_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
