On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:45:37PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > You suggested a better way and since I informed you that I tried that > without arguing against it, it should be obvious that I agreed with > you. Also since I informed you that I tried it and then I resend the > original patch, what other possibility remains than "I tried, failed > and will want to keep this patch unless you can help me out in making > it better"? Resending an older iteration of a patch while an improved version is in the work without any explanation is highly unusual, that's why I didn't really know what to think of it, and preferred not to make any assumptions as to why you were resending it. Since this patch is an enhancement that is not required by any of the pending patch series, it sounds better to me to wait until the new version is working. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpXiIcr3a7mp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
