On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > NACK, this only addresses half of the review comments. Can you please explain 1207959552 is not 1GB? Do you happen to mean 1000000000? The reason the term 'GiB' exists is because while GB might mean 1000000000, its almost always misused to mean 1207959552. If thats what you meant, Why do you want to use that value when you yourself are saying that its less accurate? Also why is it so important to use the less accurate value that these patches have to be NACKed for it? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
