Re: %post question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Your correct.. I was trying to do an HTTP install first, then switched 
over to NFS after reading some of the posts off the list. But I didn't see 
the info on "-o nolock" until after I posted my question.

Thanks for also explaining why HTTP-NFS was not working.. Makes perfect 
sense. 

On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Philip Rowlands wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, John wrote:
> 
> >> I saw on one of the other posts that you need to do an NFS install if you
> >> want to later in youe %post do any type of NFS mount.. Some I'm doing an
> >
> >I don't believe that's actually true. You _do_ have to have the network
> >configured, and that almost certainly means some kind of network
> >install.
> 
> The NFS modules (nfsd, lockd, sunrpc) will not be loaded at the start of
> %post unless you have done an NFS install. Because the first stage
> loader, where the modules for the installer kernel live, has been
> occluded by the second stage filesystem, you cannot load them at %post
> time. You cannot load them from the /mnt/sysimage tree because the
> kernel versions don't match.
> 
> Possible workarounds (untested):
> 
> - Rebuild the boot disk/cd with kernel-BOOT packages which match the
> kernel being installed.
> - Use %pre or %post somehow to poke around the various /dev/ram devices
> with debugfs, extract the necessary modules and insmod them in the right
> order.
> 
> (TTBOMK)
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Phil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kickstart-list mailing list
> Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux