Bruce Lowekamp wrote:
Thanks for Forrest Taylor for quickly responding that this method works fine WITHOUT the "interactive" keyword.I think I will not even begin to try to figure this one out, but surely this is a bug?Thanks for the quick responses. Bruce
Apparently it is a bug. Please enter this into bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com), and see if Red Hat can duplicate this error. If you need help with bugzilla, let me know.
Forrest --
