Re: redhat updates add new prerequisites (huh?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yep. The -Fvh slip was a result of boilerplate text.  The perl errata
requires -Uvh; when using -Uvh, it should work properly.

(shameless plug) Also worth noting is that up2date solves all of the
issues; rhn_register will set your machine up, and up2date will
deliver updates.  https://rhn.redhat.com/ for details.  It's free for
home/individual users, so it may help in this case.  :)

Chip

"James S. Martin" <james.martin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yes Redhat really screwed up when they released that Perl errata
> update, and I grilled them for it.  Originally they said it could be
> updated with a -Fvh, so I submitted a bug
> report,(http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60800)
> which they closed, and then I resubbed it, and they went and fixed the
> page, and changed it to a Uvh.
> 
> -- 
> James S. Martin
> RHCE (Redhat Certified Engineer)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Skahan, Vince wrote:
> > I see that rh72 has a perl update available.  Cool. The problem is that
> > it adds four new corequisites, also available as "updates".  Not cool.
> > Those new packages are 'not' updates to existing rh72 packages.
> > They're
> > new packages delivered in the updates tree on redhat.com.  Is there any way
> > to batch-mode get the new perl (and prerequisites/corequisites) installed in
> > a simple way ?
> > Other than the obvious "hey RH, that was dumb" comment, I guess I
> > see a
> > limitation in rpm.
> >   rpm -ivh installs something new   rpm -Uvh upgrades something
> > there before absolutely
> >   rpm -Fvh freshens something that's there before if needed only
> > There doesn't seem to be an option saying:
> >  - freshen what is there already
> >           and
> >  - install any corequisites/prerequisites needed to do the freshening
> > I'd like to just have one big directory of all the updates available
> > for
> > rh72
> > at this time, and say "update everything I have installed, plus anything
> > else for the new updates too" without needing to absolutely specify the
> > rpms to update.
> > Is there any way to do this, assuming that I have a local CD of
> > updates
> > installed/mounted and no Internet connectivity at all when doing the update
> > ?
> > --
> > ---------- vince.skahan@xxxxxxxxxx --------------
> >    Connexion by Boeing - Cabin Network
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kickstart-list mailing list
> > Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kickstart-list mailing list
> Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
> 

-- 
Chip Turner                   cturner@xxxxxxxxxx
                              Red Hat Network





[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux