Re: All packages i686 better performance than i386? [was RE: Ki ckstart-list digest, Vol 1 #359 - 13 msgs]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Many thanks for this help.
> > Do you know if this also works if you replace i386 packages with
> > recompiled i686 ones? If so has anyone actually benchmarked a system
> > with a standard install vs the same packages recomiled to i686. 
> > The reason I ask is that my requirement for linux is for intensive
> > number crunching and so to get a 5% to 10% performance 
> > increase would be
> > sufficient justification for recompiling - on the other hand 
> > no good if
> > you can't kickstart from it.
> > cheers
> >  
I think redhat only uses CPU specific rpms for the kernel and glibc.
That seems to get most of the gain you would get for CPU specific compiles.

Chuck





[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux