Re: Problems with the RpmModule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, brett lentz wrote:

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, brett lentz wrote:


1. Don't use  python-2.6 syntax  as  Func should work with RHEL 4 and
RHEL 5  and other Red Hat Clone Distros  :)
2. Keep RpmModule  rpm native,  no yum stuff inside.  that is what the
yummodule is  for.


I actually checked in the rpms.py patches yesterday.


I'd actually like to see about using func's git a little less distributed
and a bit more central. So we don't end up with 20 different versions out in
random people's trees.

That's how I'm using git at $dayjob.  A central hub that everyone
pushes their changesets into.

For most projects, having an 'authoritative' tree is ideal.

Agreed.



And maybe have all commits to the main tree emailed to this list.

what do you think?

That makes sense to me.  Func-list is low traffic, and I think adding
commit mails wouldn't be a huge increase in mail traffic.


okay - I'll work on making that happen.

-sv
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Networking]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux