On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > makkalot@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > FuncWeb is definitely a neat idea. If you're interested in adding to it, > Arthur, I think it could have an interesting future. I would be quite interested, most of my actual experience is in web development (I'm trying to increase my other development experience) > As for the "no software installed/SSH" thing, no, Func is designed to /not/ > require SSH key deployment, as that is actually somewhat /easier/ to deploy > than SSH in many instances. I see, I understand. I will be playing with it soon. > It's not really a problem when you deploy your machines originally such that > they have Func installed from day 1, and we have some instructions > for using Cobbler to do this up at http://fedorahosted.org/cobbler. Cool > I suspect the Windows port may be challenging, but as long as the crypto > libraries still are available and some of the things that deal with paths > can be sufficiently abstracted Just to be clear, the only part that I am interested in having work on other platforms is the controller. And based on what I have read so far, it seems like it would end up being just a desktop version of Func Web. I am not clear as to if a desktop version would have any benefits except for familiarity, if that at all. > and coded around, it should be possible. We have talked about making the > modules smart enough to know how to do things a bit differently on different > platforms. > > Take a look if you like... Will do. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) _______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
