Re: Func over Apache QMF?

[Silas Sewell <silas@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've been scheming about different transports mechanism for Func (ActiveMQ, Pyro, etc...). I don't think Func is going to scale until the transport system is updated to something more robust than xmlrpc (and QMF looks like a good option).

I would be willing to spend significant development time on something like this.

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm sitting in a presentation right now for QMF ... looks rather slick.

http://qpid.apache.org/qmf-python-console-tutorial.html

It does sync, async, routing (like our delegation), publish/subscribe type things, and offline delivery.   I think the plan is to rely on kerberos for security though, but perhaps you could also use certmaster.

Func-over-QMF, anyone?  (I know we talked about AMQP earlier, this is a level above).

I think Func's interest in the API, so the transport (and even certmaster) may not be critical.   Perhaps it could do both.

--Michael

_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list

-- 
Silas Sewell

720-863-4557 | www.silassewell.com
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list