Luca Foppiano wrote:
----- "Michael DeHaan" <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it seems a good feature because simplify in a good way the managing of
return data from functions, however I think call back-end through launch a command
is a bit dirty, but is definetely the quickest and simplest way, so +1 :)
I think to continue also my develop on a client/server implementation
(I hope to finish before the end of the world) so we have another way
to communicate to func.
it's ok or is useless
I think it would be useful. At some point it might make sense to split
overlord into an overlord
daemon and an overlord client. Maybe even just a funcd running with a
different module set.
It would be a bit of overhead, but some nice abilities added as well.
The stdin idea was just something that occurred to me as something
possibly in the middle.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
