Re: Func and kerberos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:40 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:38 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:
> 
> > Speaking of that, I was wondering what you guys think is the most
> > interesting thing about func. So far I've seen basically 3 interesting
> > bits (there is likely more that I am missing):
> > 
> > 1) Managing multiple systems at once w/ the possibility of globbing (and
> > grouping later I guess).
> > 
> > 2) Simplified scripting of commands for running on many systems.
> > 
> > 3) An xml-rpc infrastructure with simplified auth to make it all work.
> 
> a simple ssl cert infrastructure for getting them signed and propagated
> among systems, by default. This infrastructure is potentially usable by:
> - yum
> - puppet
> - nagios
> - cacti
> 

If you plan to use this cert infrastructure more broadly then my
concerns about the weaknesses grow quite a bit.

> > 
> > To me, 1 and 2 are the most compelling aspects and 3 seems to overlap
> > quite a bit with ssh.
> 
> except ssh involves shells, which is not what we want to start
> programming from.
> 

But ssh would just be the transport / authentication mechanism that
could be hidden. It could immediately exec a bit of python code that has
the good parts of your current system.

Karl


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Networking]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux