On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:59:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:30:54 +0300 > Zacharias Mitzelos <mitzie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > After my workshop at Flock about the Fedora Wiki, we discussed many > > ways to improve and reorganize the wiki, and we sat down with Brian > > Exelbierd and Peter Travis to discuss it more thoroughly and discuss > > how the wiki should operate from now on and keep pages and content in > > general, organized. > > > > So let me sum up the things that we wrote on the pad, and feel free to > > visit it yourself here[1]: > > ...snip... > > So, a few things to note here: > > We are planning a upgrade to the wiki to the new LTS version. Any > scripts/plugins we should make sure work with the new version, not the > existing one. This upgrade will likely be after beta. > > It's probibly good to have this conversation on the devel and/or test > lists too, as those groups use the wiki quite a lot too and possibly > for things you haven't thought of. Here's some more off the top of my > head: > > * Common bugs. Would this become a doc? How easy would it be to update > (common bugs gets updated a ton in the run up to a release). > > * User pages. I think there was talk about moving this into hubs, but I > don't know the status of it. > > * SOP's. I know releng has all their SOP's in the wiki, other groups > likey too. Thats not end user facing really, so it would just > stay? Opinion: Yes. > * Test days. This gets used a bunch for test days and qa results. Those > stay? Opinion: Yes. > * Test cases. bodhi2 grabs test cases from the wiki for packages. Opinion: Yes. > * Ambassadors events. This is sort of end user facing as users are > pointed there to know if Fedora is going to be at events, etc. I could see this going to Hubs or something else. > * Changes for releases. We have these as bugs, but also there's still > wiki change pages. We want this to be as zero-friction as possible for maintainers, FESCo, etc. -- seems internally facing, and thus appropriate for wiki. > That all said, I am in favor of more automated cleanup and marking > things. We could also add more namespaces and have different policies > for them, or even more wiki's if needed. -1 more wikis but +1 namespaces! :-) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
