Re: Feedback from Distrowatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Danishka Navin" <danishka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 < inode0@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> 
> If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then
> it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a
> problem.
> 
> If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a
> problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control.
> We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as
> well.
> 
> Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some
> similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't
> mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us
> to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so
> more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something
> else?
> 
> it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those
> people.
> but there is no such information i guess.
> 
> I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially
> in Facebook itself.
> 

Maybe it's something that Red Hat legal should have handled years ago and didn't?

-- Bob
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux